Indigenous data are those which are derived from research conducted for, by, about, and/or with Indigenous individuals, communities, and/or Nations. |
At Douglas College, all research involving human participants must be conducted in accordance with the principles laid out by the Tri-Agencies' Panel on Research Ethics (TCPS 2 2022). These principles acknowledge that
"First Nations, Inuit, and Métis communities have unique histories, cultures, and traditions. They also share some core values such as reciprocity – the obligation to give something back in return for gifts received – which they advance as the necessary basis for relationships that can benefit both Indigenous and research communities" (Panel on Research Ethics. TCPS 2 (2022). Chapter 9: Preamble).
The Tri-Agencies Panel on Research Ethics (aka, TCPS 2) further affirms that research conducted for, by, about, and/or with Indigenous individuals, communities, territories or Nations should be:
"Existing principles within the open data movement (e.g. FAIR: findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) primarily focus on characteristics of data that will facilitate increased data sharing among entities while ignoring power differentials and historical contexts. The emphasis on greater data sharing alone creates a tension for Indigenous Peoples who are also asserting greater control over the application and use of Indigenous data and Indigenous Knowledge for collective benefit" (Global Indigenous Data Alliance. CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance). |
As a result of the aforementioned tensions, The CARE principles were created in order to support Indigenous data governance efforts and to ensure that a set of principles exist that are "people and purpose-oriented, reflecting the crucial role of data in advancing Indigenous innovation and self-determination." (GIDA. Care Principles for Indigenous Data Governance).
To learn more about CARE and other community principles see the box below.
The following have been developed to guide researchers in ensuring that Indigenous Peoples benefit from the data derived from their participation in research projects. It's important to note, however, that none of these principles have been developed as a generic approach. Each community is distinct, and has different customs and protocols for working with external researchers, so researchers should approach new communities with this in mind. |
Traditional Knowledge Labels are used by Indigenous communities to make clear how their traditional knowledge may be accessed and/or used by others in ways that are consistent with "existing community rules, governance and protocols for using, sharing and circulating knowledge and data."
The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance are designed to complement the FAIR principles and take into account the current and historic power imbalances between researchers and Indigenous communities. CARE stands for:
See the Global Indigenous Data Alliance web site to learn more about the CARE Principals.
See also: GIDA's Indigenous Peoples' Rights in Data
The OCAP® Principles of data governance outline how to interact with First Nations data. OCAP® stands for:
OCAP® certifications are available through the First Nations Information Governance Centre (FNIGC). OCAP® is a registered trademark of the FNIGC.
Negotiating Research Relationships with Inuit Communities: from the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Nunavut Research Institute, this is an online guide for researchers (PDF).
Principles of Ethical Métis Research: from the National Aboriginal Health Organization (NAHO), this is an online guide for researchers (PDF).
TCPS 2: CORE-2022 (Course on Research Ethics): Module 9 of this course covers research involving Indigenous Peoples and must be completed by all Douglas College researchers engaging in research with human subjects before submitting an application to the REB for approval.
Indigenous Research: (SHHRC)
Definition of Indigenous Research: (SHHRC)
Indigenous Data Governance: Indigenous Research Support Initiative (IRSI)